Ryzen 7 6800H vs Core i7-9700K
Description
The 6800H is based on Zen 3+ architecture while the i7-9700K is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 6800H gets a score of 478.7 k points while the i7-9700K gets 460 k points.
Summarizing, the 6800H is 1 times faster than the i7-9700K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 6800H gets a score of 478.7 k points while the i7-9700K gets 460 k points.
Summarizing, the 6800H is 1 times faster than the i7-9700K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a40f41
906ec
Core
Rembrandt
Coffee Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.7 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP7
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/8
TDP
45 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
12288 kB
Date
January 2022
October 2018
Mean monothread perf.
77.93k points
73.62k points
Mean multithread perf.
478.73k points
460.02k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
6800H
i7-9700K
Test#1 (Integers)
21.04k
29.3k (x1.39)
Test#2 (FP)
22.41k
25.61k (x1.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.21k
5.86k (x0.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.27k
12.86k (x0.53)
TOTAL
77.93k
73.62k (x0.94)
Multithread
6800H
i7-9700K
Test#1 (Integers)
158.65k
217.77k (x1.37)
Test#2 (FP)
215.86k
190.46k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
89.45k
40.48k (x0.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.77k
11.31k (x0.77)
TOTAL
478.73k
460.02k (x0.96)
Performance/W
6800H
i7-9700K
Test#1 (Integers)
3526 points/W
2292 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4797 points/W
2005 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1988 points/W
426 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
328 points/W
119 points/W
TOTAL
10638 points/W
4842 points/W
Performance/GHz
6800H
i7-9700K
Test#1 (Integers)
4477 points/GHz
5981 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4768 points/GHz
5226 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2173 points/GHz
1195 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5163 points/GHz
2624 points/GHz
TOTAL
16581 points/GHz
15025 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4