Ryzen 7 6800H vs Core i7-10510U
Description
The 6800H is based on Zen 3+ architecture while the i7-10510U is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 6800H gets a score of 478.7 k points while the i7-10510U gets 190.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 6800H is 2.5 times faster than the i7-10510U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 6800H gets a score of 478.7 k points while the i7-10510U gets 190.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 6800H is 2.5 times faster than the i7-10510U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a40f41
806ec
Core
Rembrandt
Comet Lake-U
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
1.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.7 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP7
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
45 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
8192 kB
Date
January 2022
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
77.93k points
59.01k points
Mean multithread perf.
478.73k points
190.82k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
6800H
i7-10510U
Test#1 (Integers)
21.04k
22.85k (x1.09)
Test#2 (FP)
22.41k
21.15k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.21k
4.78k (x0.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.27k
10.24k (x0.42)
TOTAL
77.93k
59.01k (x0.76)
Multithread
6800H
i7-10510U
Test#1 (Integers)
158.65k
86.08k (x0.54)
Test#2 (FP)
215.86k
79.78k (x0.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
89.45k
18.26k (x0.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.77k
6.69k (x0.45)
TOTAL
478.73k
190.82k (x0.4)
Performance/W
6800H
i7-10510U
Test#1 (Integers)
3526 points/W
5739 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4797 points/W
5319 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1988 points/W
1217 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
328 points/W
446 points/W
TOTAL
10638 points/W
12721 points/W
Performance/GHz
6800H
i7-10510U
Test#1 (Integers)
4477 points/GHz
4664 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4768 points/GHz
4316 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2173 points/GHz
975 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5163 points/GHz
2089 points/GHz
TOTAL
16581 points/GHz
12044 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4