| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 6800H vs Core i5-1038NG7


Description
The 6800H is based on Zen 3+ architecture while the i5-1038NG7 is based on Ice Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 6800H gets a score of 478.7 k points while the i5-1038NG7 gets 243.2 k points.

Summarizing, the 6800H is 2 times faster than the i5-1038NG7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a40f41
706e5
Core
Rembrandt
Ice Lake-U
Architecture
Zen 3+
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.7 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP7
FCBGA1344
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
45 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2022
May 2020
Mean monothread perf.
77.93k points
65.35k points
Mean multithread perf.
478.73k points
243.18k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
6800H
i5-1038NG7
Test#1 (Integers)
21.04k
23.2k (x1.1)
Test#2 (FP)
22.41k
21.2k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.21k
9.4k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.27k
11.54k (x0.48)
TOTAL
77.93k
65.35k (x0.84)

Multithread

6800H

i5-1038NG7
Test#1 (Integers)
158.65k
94.68k (x0.6)
Test#2 (FP)
215.86k
103.38k (x0.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
89.45k
35.79k (x0.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.77k
9.33k (x0.63)
TOTAL
478.73k
243.18k (x0.51)

Performance/W
6800H
i5-1038NG7
Test#1 (Integers)
3526 points/W
3381 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4797 points/W
3692 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1988 points/W
1278 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
328 points/W
333 points/W
TOTAL
10638 points/W
8685 points/W

Performance/GHz
6800H
i5-1038NG7
Test#1 (Integers)
4477 points/GHz
6106 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4768 points/GHz
5580 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2173 points/GHz
2473 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5163 points/GHz
3037 points/GHz
TOTAL
16581 points/GHz
17197 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4