| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 6800H vs Core i3-10105


Description
The 6800H is based on Zen 3+ architecture while the i3-10105 is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 6800H gets a score of 478.7 k points while the i3-10105 gets 253.9 k points.

Summarizing, the 6800H is 1.9 times faster than the i3-10105. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a40f41
a0653
Core
Rembrandt
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Zen 3+
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.7 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP7
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2022
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
77.93k points
68.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
478.73k points
253.93k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
6800H
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
21.04k
28.9k (x1.37)
Test#2 (FP)
22.41k
25.85k (x1.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.21k
5.88k (x0.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.27k
8.29k (x0.34)
TOTAL
77.93k
68.92k (x0.88)

Multithread

6800H

i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
158.65k
111.69k (x0.7)
Test#2 (FP)
215.86k
110.23k (x0.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
89.45k
28.45k (x0.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.77k
3.56k (x0.24)
TOTAL
478.73k
253.93k (x0.53)

Performance/W
6800H
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
3526 points/W
1718 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4797 points/W
1696 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1988 points/W
438 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
328 points/W
55 points/W
TOTAL
10638 points/W
3907 points/W

Performance/GHz
6800H
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
4477 points/GHz
6568 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4768 points/GHz
5876 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2173 points/GHz
1337 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5163 points/GHz
1883 points/GHz
TOTAL
16581 points/GHz
15664 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4