Ryzen 7 6800H vs Ryzen 9 5900HS
Description
The 6800H is based on Zen 3+ architecture while the 5900HS is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 6800H gets a score of 478.7 k points while the 5900HS gets 435 k points.
Summarizing, the 6800H is 1.1 times faster than the 5900HS. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 6800H gets a score of 478.7 k points while the 5900HS gets 435 k points.
Summarizing, the 6800H is 1.1 times faster than the 5900HS. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a40f41
a50f00
Core
Rembrandt
Cezanne
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.7 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP7
BGA-FP6
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
45 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
16384 kB
Date
January 2022
December 2021
Mean monothread perf.
77.93k points
81.87k points
Mean multithread perf.
478.73k points
434.96k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
6800H
5900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
21.04k
21.2k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
22.41k
25k (x1.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.21k
11.44k (x1.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.27k
24.22k (x1)
TOTAL
77.93k
81.87k (x1.05)
Multithread
6800H
5900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
158.65k
145.13k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
215.86k
198.36k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
89.45k
85.67k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.77k
5.79k (x0.39)
TOTAL
478.73k
434.96k (x0.91)
Performance/W
6800H
5900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
3526 points/W
4147 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4797 points/W
5667 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1988 points/W
2448 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
328 points/W
166 points/W
TOTAL
10638 points/W
12427 points/W
Performance/GHz
6800H
5900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
4477 points/GHz
4608 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4768 points/GHz
5436 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2173 points/GHz
2488 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5163 points/GHz
5266 points/GHz
TOTAL
16581 points/GHz
17797 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4