| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 6800H vs 5800H


Description
The 6800H is based on Zen 3+ architecture while the 5800H is based on Zen 3.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 6800H gets a score of 478.7 k points while the 5800H gets 426.9 k points.

Summarizing, the 6800H is 1.1 times faster than the 5800H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a40f41
a50f00
Core
Rembrandt
Cezanne
Architecture
Zen 3+
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.7 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP7
BGA 1140
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
45 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
16384 kB
Date
January 2022
February 2021
Mean monothread perf.
77.93k points
74.56k points
Mean multithread perf.
478.73k points
426.9k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
6800H
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
21.04k
20.37k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
22.41k
22.52k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.21k
10.18k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.27k
21.49k (x0.89)
TOTAL
77.93k
74.56k (x0.96)

Multithread

6800H

5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
158.65k
144.01k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
215.86k
191.86k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
89.45k
84.53k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.77k
6.5k (x0.44)
TOTAL
478.73k
426.9k (x0.89)

Performance/W
6800H
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
3526 points/W
3200 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4797 points/W
4264 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1988 points/W
1878 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
328 points/W
144 points/W
TOTAL
10638 points/W
9487 points/W

Performance/GHz
6800H
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
4477 points/GHz
4630 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4768 points/GHz
5117 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2173 points/GHz
2314 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5163 points/GHz
4883 points/GHz
TOTAL
16581 points/GHz
16944 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4