| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 6800H vs 3800X


Description
The 6800H is based on Zen 3+ architecture while the 3800X is based on Zen 2.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 6800H gets a score of 478.7 k points while the 3800X gets 497.7 k points.

Summarizing, the 3800X is 1 times faster than the 6800H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a40f41
870f10
Core
Rembrandt
Matisse
Architecture
Zen 3+
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
3.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.7 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP7
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
45 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
32768 kB
Date
January 2022
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
77.93k points
75.81k points
Mean multithread perf.
478.73k points
497.74k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
6800H
3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
21.04k
17.1k (x0.81)
Test#2 (FP)
22.41k
26.59k (x1.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.21k
8.91k (x0.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.27k
23.21k (x0.96)
TOTAL
77.93k
75.81k (x0.97)

Multithread

6800H

3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
158.65k
172.04k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
215.86k
214.03k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
89.45k
97.1k (x1.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.77k
14.57k (x0.99)
TOTAL
478.73k
497.74k (x1.04)

Performance/W
6800H
3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
3526 points/W
1638 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4797 points/W
2038 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1988 points/W
925 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
328 points/W
139 points/W
TOTAL
10638 points/W
4740 points/W

Performance/GHz
6800H
3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
4477 points/GHz
3799 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4768 points/GHz
5909 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2173 points/GHz
1981 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5163 points/GHz
5158 points/GHz
TOTAL
16581 points/GHz
16847 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4