Ryzen 7 6800H vs Core i7-12700
Description
The 6800H is based on Zen 3+ architecture while the i7-12700 is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 6800H gets a score of 478.7 k points while the i7-12700 gets 698.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-12700 is 1.5 times faster than the 6800H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 6800H gets a score of 478.7 k points while the i7-12700 gets 698.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-12700 is 1.5 times faster than the 6800H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a40f41
90672
Core
Rembrandt
Alder Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.7 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP7
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
8/16
12/20
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32/4x64+8x48/4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x1280+4x2048 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
25600 kB
Date
January 2022
November 2021
Mean monothread perf.
77.93k points
104.01k points
Mean multithread perf.
478.73k points
698.34k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
6800H
i7-12700
Test#1 (Integers)
21.04k
48.39k (x2.3)
Test#2 (FP)
22.41k
26.92k (x1.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.21k
13.37k (x1.31)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.27k
15.34k (x0.63)
TOTAL
77.93k
104.01k (x1.33)
Multithread
6800H
i7-12700
Test#1 (Integers)
158.65k
415.67k (x2.62)
Test#2 (FP)
215.86k
158.57k (x0.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
89.45k
109.37k (x1.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.77k
14.72k (x1)
TOTAL
478.73k
698.34k (x1.46)
Performance/W
6800H
i7-12700
Test#1 (Integers)
3526 points/W
6395 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4797 points/W
2440 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1988 points/W
1683 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
328 points/W
226 points/W
TOTAL
10638 points/W
10744 points/W
Performance/GHz
6800H
i7-12700
Test#1 (Integers)
4477 points/GHz
9876 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4768 points/GHz
5493 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2173 points/GHz
2728 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5163 points/GHz
3131 points/GHz
TOTAL
16581 points/GHz
21227 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4