| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 6800H vs Core i9-11900H


Description
The 6800H is based on Zen 3+ architecture while the i9-11900H is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 6800H gets a score of 478.7 k points while the i9-11900H gets 584.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-11900H is 1.2 times faster than the 6800H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a40f41
806d1
Core
Rembrandt
Tiger Lake-H
Architecture
Zen 3+
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.7 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP7
BGA 1787
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
45 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x48 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x1280 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
24576 kB
Date
January 2022
May 2021
Mean monothread perf.
77.93k points
89.19k points
Mean multithread perf.
478.73k points
584.47k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
6800H
i9-11900H
Test#1 (Integers)
21.04k
33.38k (x1.59)
Test#2 (FP)
22.41k
27.12k (x1.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.21k
11.69k (x1.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.27k
17k (x0.7)
TOTAL
77.93k
89.19k (x1.14)

Multithread

6800H

i9-11900H
Test#1 (Integers)
158.65k
249.83k (x1.57)
Test#2 (FP)
215.86k
237.26k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
89.45k
84.18k (x0.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.77k
13.2k (x0.89)
TOTAL
478.73k
584.47k (x1.22)

Performance/W
6800H
i9-11900H
Test#1 (Integers)
3526 points/W
5552 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4797 points/W
5272 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1988 points/W
1871 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
328 points/W
293 points/W
TOTAL
10638 points/W
12988 points/W

Performance/GHz
6800H
i9-11900H
Test#1 (Integers)
4477 points/GHz
6812 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4768 points/GHz
5535 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2173 points/GHz
2386 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5163 points/GHz
3469 points/GHz
TOTAL
16581 points/GHz
18202 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4