| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 5800X vs Xeon E5-2670 v3


Description
The 5800X is based on Zen 3 architecture while the E5-2670 v3 is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5800X gets a score of 558.4 k points while the E5-2670 v3 gets 452.9 k points.

Summarizing, the 5800X is 1.2 times faster than the E5-2670 v3. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a20f12
306f2
Core
Vermeer
Haswell-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.8 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.7 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
8/16
12/24
TDP
105 W
120 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
12x256 kB
Cache L3
32768 kB
30720 kB
Date
November 2020
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
89.53k points
36.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
558.41k points
452.9k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
5800X
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
4.98k
3.52k (x0.71)
Test#2 (FP)
20.57k
8.68k (x0.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.22k
2.83k (x0.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
28.62k
3.13k (x0.11)
TOTAL
66.39k
18.17k (x0.27)

Multithread

5800X

E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
35.09k
32.7k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
171.84k
105.18k (x0.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
107.67k
35.18k (x0.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.83k
9.54k (x0.88)
TOTAL
325.43k
182.59k (x0.56)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
5800X
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
18.06k
11.08k (x0.61)
Test#2 (FP)
25k
9.57k (x0.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.8k
3.18k (x0.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
29.51k
3.28k (x0.11)
TOTAL
85.37k
27.11k (x0.32)

Multithread

5800X

E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
125.71k
139.07k (x1.11)
Test#2 (FP)
196.66k
133.47k (x0.68)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
113.22k
46.6k (x0.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.92k
6.65k (x0.67)
TOTAL
445.51k
325.78k (x0.73)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
5800X
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
18.1k
11.18k (x0.62)
Test#2 (FP)
26.41k
10.06k (x0.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.39k
3.21k (x0.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
26.06k
3.12k (x0.12)
TOTAL
82.95k
27.57k (x0.33)

Multithread

5800X

E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
125.9k
140.98k (x1.12)
Test#2 (FP)
233.26k
145.37k (x0.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
109.66k
45.62k (x0.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.21k
6.75k (x0.66)
TOTAL
479.02k
338.73k (x0.71)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5800X
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
24.3k
18.62k (x0.77)
Test#2 (FP)
26.46k
10.49k (x0.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.18k
4.04k (x0.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
26.58k
3.26k (x0.12)
TOTAL
89.53k
36.41k (x0.41)

Multithread

5800X

E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
187.4k
236.25k (x1.26)
Test#2 (FP)
246.12k
151.05k (x0.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
113.16k
58.9k (x0.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.74k
6.7k (x0.57)
TOTAL
558.41k
452.9k (x0.81)

Performance/W
5800X
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
1785 points/W
1969 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2344 points/W
1259 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1078 points/W
491 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
112 points/W
56 points/W
TOTAL
5318 points/W
3774 points/W

Performance/GHz
5800X
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
5170 points/GHz
6006 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5631 points/GHz
3385 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2592 points/GHz
1303 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5656 points/GHz
1052 points/GHz
TOTAL
19049 points/GHz
11745 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4