| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 5800X vs Core i5-8300H


Description
The 5800X is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i5-8300H is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5800X gets a score of 558.4 k points while the i5-8300H gets 182.5 k points.

Summarizing, the 5800X is 3.1 times faster than the i5-8300H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a20f12
906ea
Core
Vermeer
Coffee Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.8 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.7 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
105 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+x4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
32768 kB
8192 kB
Date
November 2020
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
89.53k points
56.72k points
Mean multithread perf.
558.41k points
182.47k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5800X
i5-8300H
Test#1 (Integers)
24.3k
23.6k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
26.46k
21.72k (x0.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.18k
4.61k (x0.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
26.58k
6.8k (x0.26)
TOTAL
89.53k
56.72k (x0.63)

Multithread

5800X

i5-8300H
Test#1 (Integers)
187.4k
79.12k (x0.42)
Test#2 (FP)
246.12k
81.27k (x0.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
113.16k
17.46k (x0.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.74k
4.62k (x0.39)
TOTAL
558.41k
182.47k (x0.33)

Performance/W
5800X
i5-8300H
Test#1 (Integers)
1785 points/W
1758 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2344 points/W
1806 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1078 points/W
388 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
112 points/W
103 points/W
TOTAL
5318 points/W
4055 points/W

Performance/GHz
5800X
i5-8300H
Test#1 (Integers)
5170 points/GHz
5899 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5631 points/GHz
5431 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2592 points/GHz
1152 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5656 points/GHz
1699 points/GHz
TOTAL
19049 points/GHz
14181 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4