| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 5800X vs 4800HS


Description
The 5800X is based on Zen 3 architecture while the 4800HS is based on Zen 2.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5800X gets a score of 558.4 k points while the 4800HS gets 427.6 k points.

Summarizing, the 5800X is 1.3 times faster than the 4800HS. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a20f12
860f01
Core
Vermeer
Renoir
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.8 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.7 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1140
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
105 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
32768 kB
2x4096 kB
Date
November 2020
March 2020
Mean monothread perf.
89.53k points
61.12k points
Mean multithread perf.
558.41k points
427.61k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5800X
4800HS
Test#1 (Integers)
24.3k
16.66k (x0.69)
Test#2 (FP)
26.46k
26.01k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.18k
9.31k (x0.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
26.58k
9.15k (x0.34)
TOTAL
89.53k
61.12k (x0.68)

Multithread

5800X

4800HS
Test#1 (Integers)
187.4k
144.48k (x0.77)
Test#2 (FP)
246.12k
192.46k (x0.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
113.16k
83.17k (x0.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.74k
7.51k (x0.64)
TOTAL
558.41k
427.61k (x0.77)

Performance/W
5800X
4800HS
Test#1 (Integers)
1785 points/W
4128 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2344 points/W
5499 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1078 points/W
2376 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
112 points/W
214 points/W
TOTAL
5318 points/W
12218 points/W

Performance/GHz
5800X
4800HS
Test#1 (Integers)
5170 points/GHz
3966 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5631 points/GHz
6194 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2592 points/GHz
2216 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5656 points/GHz
2177 points/GHz
TOTAL
19049 points/GHz
14553 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4