| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 5800X vs Core i9-13900K


Description
The 5800X is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i9-13900K is based on Raptor Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5800X gets a score of 558.4 k points while the i9-13900K gets 1763.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-13900K is 3.2 times faster than the 5800X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a20f12
b0671
Core
Vermeer
Raptor Lake-S
Architecture
Zen 3
Base frecuency
3.8 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.7 GHz
5.8 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
8/16
24/32
TDP
105 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x2048+4x4096 kB
Cache L3
32768 kB
36864 kB
Date
November 2020
October 2022
Mean monothread perf.
89.53k points
129.15k points
Mean multithread perf.
558.41k points
1763.08k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
5800X
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
4.98k
9.77k (x1.96)
Test#2 (FP)
20.57k
24.52k (x1.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.22k
17.17k (x1.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
28.62k
21.37k (x0.75)
TOTAL
66.39k
72.83k (x1.1)

Multithread

5800X

i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
35.09k
145.21k (x4.14)
Test#2 (FP)
171.84k
444.95k (x2.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
107.67k
318.3k (x2.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.83k
27.2k (x2.51)
TOTAL
325.43k
935.66k (x2.88)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
5800X
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
18.06k
31.93k (x1.77)
Test#2 (FP)
25k
31.54k (x1.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.8k
18.8k (x1.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
29.51k
20.82k (x0.71)
TOTAL
85.37k
103.09k (x1.21)

Multithread

5800X

i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
125.71k
522.07k (x4.15)
Test#2 (FP)
196.66k
584.17k (x2.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
113.22k
344.38k (x3.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.92k
25.36k (x2.56)
TOTAL
445.51k
1475.97k (x3.31)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
5800X
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
18.1k
31.8k (x1.76)
Test#2 (FP)
26.41k
32.83k (x1.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.39k
18.37k (x1.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
26.06k
21.13k (x0.81)
TOTAL
82.95k
104.13k (x1.26)

Multithread

5800X

i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
125.9k
532.97k (x4.23)
Test#2 (FP)
233.26k
596.78k (x2.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
109.66k
342.96k (x3.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.21k
28.6k (x2.8)
TOTAL
479.02k
1501.31k (x3.13)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5800X
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
24.3k
58.6k (x2.41)
Test#2 (FP)
26.46k
33.29k (x1.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.18k
17.77k (x1.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
26.58k
19.49k (x0.73)
TOTAL
89.53k
129.15k (x1.44)

Multithread

5800X

i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
187.4k
804.04k (x4.29)
Test#2 (FP)
246.12k
613.45k (x2.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
113.16k
311.08k (x2.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.74k
34.5k (x2.94)
TOTAL
558.41k
1763.08k (x3.16)

Performance/W
5800X
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
1785 points/W
6432 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2344 points/W
4908 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1078 points/W
2489 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
112 points/W
276 points/W
TOTAL
5318 points/W
14105 points/W

Performance/GHz
5800X
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
5170 points/GHz
10104 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5631 points/GHz
5739 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2592 points/GHz
3064 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5656 points/GHz
3360 points/GHz
TOTAL
19049 points/GHz
22268 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4