| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 5800X vs Core i9-11900H


Description
The 5800X is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i9-11900H is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5800X gets a score of 558.4 k points while the i9-11900H gets 584.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-11900H is 1 times faster than the 5800X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a20f12
806d1
Core
Vermeer
Tiger Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.8 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.7 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1787
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
105 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x48 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x1280 kB
Cache L3
32768 kB
24576 kB
Date
November 2020
May 2021
Mean monothread perf.
89.53k points
89.19k points
Mean multithread perf.
558.41k points
584.47k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5800X
i9-11900H
Test#1 (Integers)
24.3k
33.38k (x1.37)
Test#2 (FP)
26.46k
27.12k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.18k
11.69k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
26.58k
17k (x0.64)
TOTAL
89.53k
89.19k (x1)

Multithread

5800X

i9-11900H
Test#1 (Integers)
187.4k
249.83k (x1.33)
Test#2 (FP)
246.12k
237.26k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
113.16k
84.18k (x0.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.74k
13.2k (x1.12)
TOTAL
558.41k
584.47k (x1.05)

Performance/W
5800X
i9-11900H
Test#1 (Integers)
1785 points/W
5552 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2344 points/W
5272 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1078 points/W
1871 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
112 points/W
293 points/W
TOTAL
5318 points/W
12988 points/W

Performance/GHz
5800X
i9-11900H
Test#1 (Integers)
5170 points/GHz
6812 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5631 points/GHz
5535 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2592 points/GHz
2386 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5656 points/GHz
3469 points/GHz
TOTAL
19049 points/GHz
18202 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4