Ryzen 7 5800X vs Core i7-10870H
Description
The 5800X is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i7-10870H is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5800X gets a score of 558.4 k points while the i7-10870H gets 487 k points.
Summarizing, the 5800X is 1.1 times faster than the i7-10870H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5800X gets a score of 558.4 k points while the i7-10870H gets 487 k points.
Summarizing, the 5800X is 1.1 times faster than the i7-10870H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a20f10
a0652
Core
Vermeer
Comet Lake-H
Base frecuency
3.8 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.7 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
AM4
FC-BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
105 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
32768 kB
16384 kB
Date
November 2020
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
89.07k points
79.2k points
Mean multithread perf.
558.42k points
487.05k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5800X
i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
24.14k
30.38k (x1.26)
Test#2 (FP)
26.3k
27.95k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.09k
6.51k (x0.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
26.54k
14.37k (x0.54)
TOTAL
89.07k
79.2k (x0.89)
Multithread
5800X
i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
183.54k
216.18k (x1.18)
Test#2 (FP)
237.27k
210.82k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
107.95k
51.57k (x0.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
29.66k
8.47k (x0.29)
TOTAL
558.42k
487.05k (x0.87)
Performance/W
5800X
i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
1748 points/W
4804 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2260 points/W
4685 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1028 points/W
1146 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
282 points/W
188 points/W
TOTAL
5318 points/W
10823 points/W
Performance/GHz
5800X
i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
5137 points/GHz
6075 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5596 points/GHz
5589 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2571 points/GHz
1302 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5646 points/GHz
2873 points/GHz
TOTAL
18951 points/GHz
15840 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4