| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 5800X vs Core i5-1035G1


Description
The 5800X is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i5-1035G1 is based on Ice Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5800X gets a score of 558.4 k points while the i5-1035G1 gets 171.6 k points.

Summarizing, the 5800X is 3.3 times faster than the i5-1035G1. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a20f10
706e5
Core
Vermeer
Ice Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.8 GHz
1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.7 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1526
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
105 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
32768 kB
6144 kB
Date
November 2020
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
89.07k points
55.37k points
Mean multithread perf.
558.42k points
171.65k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5800X
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
24.14k
21.5k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
26.3k
17.71k (x0.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.09k
7.92k (x0.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
26.54k
8.24k (x0.31)
TOTAL
89.07k
55.37k (x0.62)

Multithread

5800X

i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
183.54k
73.03k (x0.4)
Test#2 (FP)
237.27k
68.19k (x0.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
107.95k
24.89k (x0.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
29.66k
5.54k (x0.19)
TOTAL
558.42k
171.65k (x0.31)

Performance/W
5800X
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
1748 points/W
4869 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2260 points/W
4546 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1028 points/W
1660 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
282 points/W
369 points/W
TOTAL
5318 points/W
11443 points/W

Performance/GHz
5800X
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
5137 points/GHz
5972 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5596 points/GHz
4919 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2571 points/GHz
2201 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5646 points/GHz
2290 points/GHz
TOTAL
18951 points/GHz
15381 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4