| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 5800X vs Core i5-10210U


Description
The 5800X is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i5-10210U is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5800X gets a score of 558.4 k points while the i5-10210U gets 147.8 k points.

Summarizing, the 5800X is 3.8 times faster than the i5-10210U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a20f10
806ec
Core
Vermeer
Comet Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.8 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.7 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
105 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
32768 kB
6144 kB
Date
November 2020
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
89.07k points
56.03k points
Mean multithread perf.
558.42k points
147.78k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5800X
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
24.14k
22.96k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
26.3k
20.8k (x0.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.09k
4.76k (x0.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
26.54k
7.5k (x0.28)
TOTAL
89.07k
56.03k (x0.63)

Multithread

5800X

i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
183.54k
66.43k (x0.36)
Test#2 (FP)
237.27k
62.38k (x0.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
107.95k
14.52k (x0.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
29.66k
4.45k (x0.15)
TOTAL
558.42k
147.78k (x0.26)

Performance/W
5800X
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
1748 points/W
4429 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2260 points/W
4158 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1028 points/W
968 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
282 points/W
297 points/W
TOTAL
5318 points/W
9852 points/W

Performance/GHz
5800X
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
5137 points/GHz
5468 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5596 points/GHz
4953 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2571 points/GHz
1134 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5646 points/GHz
1785 points/GHz
TOTAL
18951 points/GHz
13340 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4