| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 5800X vs Core i3-6100


Description
The 5800X is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i3-6100 is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5800X gets a score of 558.4 k points while the i3-6100 gets 112.3 k points.

Summarizing, the 5800X is 5 times faster than the i3-6100 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a20f10
506e3
Core
Vermeer
Skylake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.8 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.7 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
8/16
2/2
TDP
105 W
51 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
32768 kB
4096 kB
Date
November 2020
September 2015
Mean monothread perf.
89.07k points
52.84k points
Mean multithread perf.
558.42k points
112.28k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5800X
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
24.14k
22.89k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
26.3k
21.04k (x0.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.09k
4.9k (x0.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
26.54k
4.01k (x0.15)
TOTAL
89.07k
52.84k (x0.59)

Multithread

5800X

i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
183.54k
50.05k (x0.27)
Test#2 (FP)
237.27k
47.13k (x0.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
107.95k
11.38k (x0.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
29.66k
3.72k (x0.13)
TOTAL
558.42k
112.28k (x0.2)

Performance/W
5800X
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
1748 points/W
981 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2260 points/W
924 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1028 points/W
223 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
282 points/W
73 points/W
TOTAL
5318 points/W
2202 points/W

Performance/GHz
5800X
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
5137 points/GHz
6187 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5596 points/GHz
5686 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2571 points/GHz
1325 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5646 points/GHz
1084 points/GHz
TOTAL
18951 points/GHz
14282 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4