| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 5800X vs Core i9-12900KF


Description
The 5800X is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i9-12900KF is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5800X gets a score of 558.4 k points while the i9-12900KF gets 1219.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-12900KF is 2.2 times faster than the 5800X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a20f10
90672
Core
Vermeer
Alder Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.8 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.7 GHz
5.2 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
8/16
16/24
TDP
105 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32/8x64+8x48/8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x1280+8x2048 kB
Cache L3
32768 kB
30720 kB
Date
November 2020
November 2021
Mean monothread perf.
89.07k points
120.97k points
Mean multithread perf.
558.42k points
1219.33k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5800X
i9-12900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
24.14k
57.05k (x2.36)
Test#2 (FP)
26.3k
29.66k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.09k
16.48k (x1.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
26.54k
17.78k (x0.67)
TOTAL
89.07k
120.97k (x1.36)

Multithread

5800X

i9-12900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
183.54k
546.04k (x2.98)
Test#2 (FP)
237.27k
437.01k (x1.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
107.95k
211.36k (x1.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
29.66k
24.92k (x0.84)
TOTAL
558.42k
1219.33k (x2.18)

Performance/W
5800X
i9-12900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
1748 points/W
4368 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2260 points/W
3496 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1028 points/W
1691 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
282 points/W
199 points/W
TOTAL
5318 points/W
9755 points/W

Performance/GHz
5800X
i9-12900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
5137 points/GHz
10972 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5596 points/GHz
5704 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2571 points/GHz
3170 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5646 points/GHz
3419 points/GHz
TOTAL
18951 points/GHz
23264 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4