| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 5800X vs Core i3-12100F


Description
The 5800X is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i3-12100F is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5800X gets a score of 558.4 k points while the i3-12100F gets 340.5 k points.

Summarizing, the 5800X is 1.6 times faster than the i3-12100F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a20f10
90675
Core
Vermeer
Alder Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.8 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.7 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
105 W
58 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+x4x48 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
32768 kB
12288 kB
Date
November 2020
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
89.07k points
88.81k points
Mean multithread perf.
558.42k points
340.49k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5800X
i3-12100F
Test#1 (Integers)
24.14k
39.54k (x1.64)
Test#2 (FP)
26.3k
23.79k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.09k
11.96k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
26.54k
13.52k (x0.51)
TOTAL
89.07k
88.81k (x1)

Multithread

5800X

i3-12100F
Test#1 (Integers)
183.54k
148k (x0.81)
Test#2 (FP)
237.27k
123.08k (x0.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
107.95k
52.73k (x0.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
29.66k
16.67k (x0.56)
TOTAL
558.42k
340.49k (x0.61)

Performance/W
5800X
i3-12100F
Test#1 (Integers)
1748 points/W
2552 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2260 points/W
2122 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1028 points/W
909 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
282 points/W
287 points/W
TOTAL
5318 points/W
5871 points/W

Performance/GHz
5800X
i3-12100F
Test#1 (Integers)
5137 points/GHz
9195 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5596 points/GHz
5532 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2571 points/GHz
2781 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5646 points/GHz
3144 points/GHz
TOTAL
18951 points/GHz
20652 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4