Ryzen 7 5800HS vs N95
Description
The 5800HS is based on Zen 3 architecture while the is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5800HS gets a score of 462.1 k points while the gets 105.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 5800HS is 4.4 times faster than the . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5800HS gets a score of 462.1 k points while the gets 105.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 5800HS is 4.4 times faster than the . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a50f00
b06e0
Core
Cezanne
Gracemont
Base frecuency
2.8 GHz
1.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
FP6
BGA 1264
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/4
TDP
35 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
2048 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
6144 kB
Date
February 2021
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
73.89k points
39.5k points
Mean multithread perf.
462.14k points
105.57k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5800HS
Test#1 (Integers)
15.43k
15.57k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
24.54k
11.5k (x0.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.88k
6.06k (x0.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
23.04k
6.36k (x0.28)
TOTAL
73.89k
39.5k (x0.53)
Multithread
5800HS
Test#1 (Integers)
154.38k
46.51k (x0.3)
Test#2 (FP)
211.82k
35.31k (x0.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
90.2k
19.27k (x0.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.73k
4.49k (x0.78)
TOTAL
462.14k
105.57k (x0.23)
Performance/W
5800HS
Test#1 (Integers)
4411 points/W
3100 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6052 points/W
2354 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2577 points/W
1285 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
164 points/W
299 points/W
TOTAL
13204 points/W
7038 points/W
Performance/GHz
5800HS
Test#1 (Integers)
3506 points/GHz
4579 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5577 points/GHz
3382 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2473 points/GHz
1783 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5237 points/GHz
1872 points/GHz
TOTAL
16792 points/GHz
11617 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4