| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 5800H vs Xeon Silver 4208


Description
The 5800H is based on Zen 3 architecture while the Silver 4208 is based on Cascade Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5800H gets a score of 426.9 k points while the Silver 4208 gets 311.6 k points.

Summarizing, the 5800H is 1.4 times faster than the Silver 4208. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a50f00
50657
Core
Cezanne
Cascade Lake-SP
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
3.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
LGA 3647
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
45 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
11264 kB
Date
February 2021
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
74.56k points
38.61k points
Mean multithread perf.
426.9k points
311.57k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
5800H
Silver 4208
Test#1 (Integers)
4.31k
2.59k (x0.6)
Test#2 (FP)
17.51k
9.5k (x0.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.53k
3.15k (x0.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
23.57k
5.9k (x0.25)
TOTAL
55.92k
21.13k (x0.38)

Multithread

5800H

Silver 4208
Test#1 (Integers)
24.18k
21.09k (x0.87)
Test#2 (FP)
117.98k
80.93k (x0.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
70.96k
30.76k (x0.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.08k
8.51k (x1.05)
TOTAL
221.19k
141.3k (x0.64)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5800H
Silver 4208
Test#1 (Integers)
20.37k
16.86k (x0.83)
Test#2 (FP)
22.52k
12.08k (x0.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.18k
3.37k (x0.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.49k
6.29k (x0.29)
TOTAL
74.56k
38.61k (x0.52)

Multithread

5800H

Silver 4208
Test#1 (Integers)
144.01k
150.99k (x1.05)
Test#2 (FP)
191.86k
118.54k (x0.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
84.53k
33.44k (x0.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.5k
8.6k (x1.32)
TOTAL
426.9k
311.57k (x0.73)

Performance/W
5800H
Silver 4208
Test#1 (Integers)
3200 points/W
1776 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4264 points/W
1395 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1878 points/W
393 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
144 points/W
101 points/W
TOTAL
9487 points/W
3666 points/W

Performance/GHz
5800H
Silver 4208
Test#1 (Integers)
4630 points/GHz
5269 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5117 points/GHz
3776 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2314 points/GHz
1054 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4883 points/GHz
1966 points/GHz
TOTAL
16944 points/GHz
12065 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4