| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 5800H vs Core i7-10870H


Description
The 5800H is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i7-10870H is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5800H gets a score of 426.9 k points while the i7-10870H gets 487 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-10870H is 1.1 times faster than the 5800H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a50f00
a0652
Core
Cezanne
Comet Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
FC-BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
45 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
16384 kB
Date
February 2021
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
74.56k points
79.2k points
Mean multithread perf.
426.9k points
487.05k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
5800H
i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
4.31k
4.77k (x1.11)
Test#2 (FP)
17.51k
19.81k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.53k
6.29k (x0.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
23.57k
14.03k (x0.6)
TOTAL
55.92k
44.9k (x0.8)

Multithread

5800H

i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
24.18k
31.21k (x1.29)
Test#2 (FP)
117.98k
151.01k (x1.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
70.96k
50.13k (x0.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.08k
8.37k (x1.04)
TOTAL
221.19k
240.71k (x1.09)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5800H
i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
20.37k
30.38k (x1.49)
Test#2 (FP)
22.52k
27.95k (x1.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.18k
6.51k (x0.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.49k
14.37k (x0.67)
TOTAL
74.56k
79.2k (x1.06)

Multithread

5800H

i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
144.01k
216.18k (x1.5)
Test#2 (FP)
191.86k
210.82k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
84.53k
51.57k (x0.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.5k
8.47k (x1.3)
TOTAL
426.9k
487.05k (x1.14)

Performance/W
5800H
i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
3200 points/W
4804 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4264 points/W
4685 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1878 points/W
1146 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
144 points/W
188 points/W
TOTAL
9487 points/W
10823 points/W

Performance/GHz
5800H
i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
4630 points/GHz
6075 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5117 points/GHz
5589 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2314 points/GHz
1302 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4883 points/GHz
2873 points/GHz
TOTAL
16944 points/GHz
15840 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4