| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 5800H vs Core i5-10500T


Description
The 5800H is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i5-10500T is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5800H gets a score of 426.9 k points while the i5-10500T gets 302.1 k points.

Summarizing, the 5800H is 1.4 times faster than the i5-10500T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a50f00
a0653
Core
Cezanne
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
45 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
12288 kB
Date
February 2021
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
74.56k points
64.6k points
Mean multithread perf.
426.9k points
302.13k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
5800H
i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
4.31k
3.87k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
17.51k
15.79k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.53k
5.1k (x0.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
23.57k
12.13k (x0.51)
TOTAL
55.92k
36.89k (x0.66)

Multithread

5800H

i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
24.18k
22.17k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
117.98k
101.79k (x0.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
70.96k
34.13k (x0.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.08k
3.74k (x0.46)
TOTAL
221.19k
161.83k (x0.73)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5800H
i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
20.37k
25.16k (x1.24)
Test#2 (FP)
22.52k
22.28k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.18k
5.18k (x0.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.49k
11.97k (x0.56)
TOTAL
74.56k
64.6k (x0.87)

Multithread

5800H

i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
144.01k
144.86k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
191.86k
120.98k (x0.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
84.53k
32.55k (x0.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.5k
3.73k (x0.57)
TOTAL
426.9k
302.13k (x0.71)

Performance/W
5800H
i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
3200 points/W
4139 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4264 points/W
3457 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1878 points/W
930 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
144 points/W
107 points/W
TOTAL
9487 points/W
8632 points/W

Performance/GHz
5800H
i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
4630 points/GHz
6621 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5117 points/GHz
5863 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2314 points/GHz
1364 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4883 points/GHz
3151 points/GHz
TOTAL
16944 points/GHz
16999 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4