| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 5800H vs Core i3-8100


Description
The 5800H is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i3-8100 is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5800H gets a score of 426.9 k points while the i3-8100 gets 200.4 k points.

Summarizing, the 5800H is 2.1 times faster than the i3-8100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a50f00
906eb
Core
Cezanne
Coffee Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/4
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
6144 kB
Date
February 2021
October 2017
Mean monothread perf.
74.56k points
59.18k points
Mean multithread perf.
426.9k points
200.4k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
5800H
i3-8100
Test#1 (Integers)
4.31k
3.72k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
17.51k
15.33k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.53k
4.71k (x0.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
23.57k
6.76k (x0.29)
TOTAL
55.92k
30.52k (x0.55)

Multithread

5800H

i3-8100
Test#1 (Integers)
24.18k
14.48k (x0.6)
Test#2 (FP)
117.98k
59.59k (x0.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
70.96k
18.07k (x0.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.08k
4.3k (x0.53)
TOTAL
221.19k
96.43k (x0.44)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5800H
i3-8100
Test#1 (Integers)
20.37k
24.47k (x1.2)
Test#2 (FP)
22.52k
21.52k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.18k
4.95k (x0.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.49k
8.24k (x0.38)
TOTAL
74.56k
59.18k (x0.79)

Multithread

5800H

i3-8100
Test#1 (Integers)
144.01k
92.86k (x0.64)
Test#2 (FP)
191.86k
83.05k (x0.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
84.53k
18.55k (x0.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.5k
5.93k (x0.91)
TOTAL
426.9k
200.4k (x0.47)

Performance/W
5800H
i3-8100
Test#1 (Integers)
3200 points/W
1429 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4264 points/W
1278 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1878 points/W
285 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
144 points/W
91 points/W
TOTAL
9487 points/W
3083 points/W

Performance/GHz
5800H
i3-8100
Test#1 (Integers)
4630 points/GHz
6797 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5117 points/GHz
5977 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2314 points/GHz
1374 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4883 points/GHz
2290 points/GHz
TOTAL
16944 points/GHz
16438 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4