Ryzen 7 5800H vs Ryzen 9 3950X
Description
The 5800H is based on Zen 3 architecture while the 3950X is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5800H gets a score of 426.9 k points while the 3950X gets 959.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 3950X is 2.2 times faster than the 5800H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5800H gets a score of 426.9 k points while the 3950X gets 959.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 3950X is 2.2 times faster than the 5800H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a50f00
870f10
Core
Cezanne
Matisse
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
3.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
16/32
TDP
45 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
16x32+16x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
16x512 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
4x16384 kB
Date
February 2021
November 2019
Mean monothread perf.
74.56k points
72.95k points
Mean multithread perf.
426.9k points
959.77k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5800H
3950X
Test#1 (Integers)
20.37k
16.49k (x0.81)
Test#2 (FP)
22.52k
26.16k (x1.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.18k
7.9k (x0.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.49k
22.4k (x1.04)
TOTAL
74.56k
72.95k (x0.98)
Multithread
5800H
3950X
Test#1 (Integers)
144.01k
334.49k (x2.32)
Test#2 (FP)
191.86k
423.74k (x2.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
84.53k
187.85k (x2.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.5k
13.69k (x2.11)
TOTAL
426.9k
959.77k (x2.25)
Performance/W
5800H
3950X
Test#1 (Integers)
3200 points/W
3186 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4264 points/W
4036 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1878 points/W
1789 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
144 points/W
130 points/W
TOTAL
9487 points/W
9141 points/W
Performance/GHz
5800H
3950X
Test#1 (Integers)
4630 points/GHz
3509 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5117 points/GHz
5566 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2314 points/GHz
1681 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4883 points/GHz
4765 points/GHz
TOTAL
16944 points/GHz
15522 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4