| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 5800H vs 4800HS


Description
The 5800H is based on Zen 3 architecture while the 4800HS is based on Zen 2.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5800H gets a score of 426.9 k points while the 4800HS gets 427.6 k points.

Summarizing, the 4800HS is 1 times faster than the 5800H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a50f00
860f01
Core
Cezanne
Renoir
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
BGA 1140
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
45 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
2x4096 kB
Date
February 2021
March 2020
Mean monothread perf.
74.56k points
61.12k points
Mean multithread perf.
426.9k points
427.61k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5800H
4800HS
Test#1 (Integers)
20.37k
16.66k (x0.82)
Test#2 (FP)
22.52k
26.01k (x1.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.18k
9.31k (x0.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.49k
9.15k (x0.43)
TOTAL
74.56k
61.12k (x0.82)

Multithread

5800H

4800HS
Test#1 (Integers)
144.01k
144.48k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
191.86k
192.46k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
84.53k
83.17k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.5k
7.51k (x1.16)
TOTAL
426.9k
427.61k (x1)

Performance/W
5800H
4800HS
Test#1 (Integers)
3200 points/W
4128 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4264 points/W
5499 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1878 points/W
2376 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
144 points/W
214 points/W
TOTAL
9487 points/W
12218 points/W

Performance/GHz
5800H
4800HS
Test#1 (Integers)
4630 points/GHz
3966 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5117 points/GHz
6194 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2314 points/GHz
2216 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4883 points/GHz
2177 points/GHz
TOTAL
16944 points/GHz
14553 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4