| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 5800H vs 4800H


Description
The 5800H is based on Zen 3 architecture while the 4800H is based on Zen 2.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5800H gets a score of 426.9 k points while the 4800H gets 436.8 k points.

Summarizing, the 4800H is 1 times faster than the 5800H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a50f00
860f01
Core
Cezanne
Renoir
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
BGA-FP6
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
45 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
2x4096 kB
Date
February 2021
January 2020
Mean monothread perf.
74.56k points
57.47k points
Mean multithread perf.
426.9k points
436.8k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5800H
4800H
Test#1 (Integers)
20.37k
16.59k (x0.81)
Test#2 (FP)
22.52k
23.51k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.18k
9.38k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.49k
7.98k (x0.37)
TOTAL
74.56k
57.47k (x0.77)

Multithread

5800H

4800H
Test#1 (Integers)
144.01k
152.43k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
191.86k
195.79k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
84.53k
83.2k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.5k
5.38k (x0.83)
TOTAL
426.9k
436.8k (x1.02)

Performance/W
5800H
4800H
Test#1 (Integers)
3200 points/W
3387 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4264 points/W
4351 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1878 points/W
1849 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
144 points/W
120 points/W
TOTAL
9487 points/W
9707 points/W

Performance/GHz
5800H
4800H
Test#1 (Integers)
4630 points/GHz
3950 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5117 points/GHz
5599 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2314 points/GHz
2234 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4883 points/GHz
1899 points/GHz
TOTAL
16944 points/GHz
13683 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4