| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 5800H vs 1700X


Description
The 5800H is based on Zen 3 architecture while the 1700X is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5800H gets a score of 426.9 k points while the 1700X gets 372.7 k points.

Summarizing, the 5800H is 1.1 times faster than the 1700X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a50f00
800f11
Core
Cezanne
Summit Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
45 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x64+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
February 2021
March 2017
Mean monothread perf.
74.56k points
56.76k points
Mean multithread perf.
426.9k points
372.73k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5800H
1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
20.37k
13.72k (x0.67)
Test#2 (FP)
22.52k
22.48k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.18k
5.12k (x0.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.49k
15.44k (x0.72)
TOTAL
74.56k
56.76k (x0.76)

Multithread

5800H

1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
144.01k
110.92k (x0.77)
Test#2 (FP)
191.86k
200.56k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
84.53k
54.24k (x0.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.5k
7.01k (x1.08)
TOTAL
426.9k
372.73k (x0.87)

Performance/W
5800H
1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
3200 points/W
1168 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4264 points/W
2111 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1878 points/W
571 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
144 points/W
74 points/W
TOTAL
9487 points/W
3923 points/W

Performance/GHz
5800H
1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
4630 points/GHz
3611 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5117 points/GHz
5916 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2314 points/GHz
1348 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4883 points/GHz
4063 points/GHz
TOTAL
16944 points/GHz
14938 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4