| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 5800H vs Ryzen 5 3600


Description
The 5800H is based on Zen 3 architecture while the 3600 is based on Zen 2.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5800H gets a score of 426.9 k points while the 3600 gets 348.4 k points.

Summarizing, the 5800H is 1.2 times faster than the 3600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a50f00
870f10
Core
Cezanne
Matisse
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
32768 kB
Date
February 2021
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
74.56k points
70.55k points
Mean multithread perf.
426.9k points
348.35k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
5800H
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
4.31k
4.2k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
17.51k
17.36k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.53k
7.5k (x0.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
23.57k
23.79k (x1.01)
TOTAL
55.92k
52.85k (x0.95)

Multithread

5800H

3600
Test#1 (Integers)
24.18k
22.11k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
117.98k
108.04k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
70.96k
56.81k (x0.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.08k
36.39k (x4.5)
TOTAL
221.19k
223.36k (x1.01)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5800H
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
20.37k
16.04k (x0.79)
Test#2 (FP)
22.52k
24.47k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.18k
8.38k (x0.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.49k
21.66k (x1.01)
TOTAL
74.56k
70.55k (x0.95)

Multithread

5800H

3600
Test#1 (Integers)
144.01k
113.63k (x0.79)
Test#2 (FP)
191.86k
143.55k (x0.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
84.53k
63.84k (x0.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.5k
27.34k (x4.21)
TOTAL
426.9k
348.35k (x0.82)

Performance/W
5800H
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
3200 points/W
1748 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4264 points/W
2208 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1878 points/W
982 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
144 points/W
421 points/W
TOTAL
9487 points/W
5359 points/W

Performance/GHz
5800H
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
4630 points/GHz
3819 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5117 points/GHz
5825 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2314 points/GHz
1995 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4883 points/GHz
5158 points/GHz
TOTAL
16944 points/GHz
16797 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4