| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 5800H vs Ryzen 3 3200G


Description
The 5800H is based on Zen 3 architecture while the 3200G is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5800H gets a score of 426.9 k points while the 3200G gets 168.7 k points.

Summarizing, the 5800H is 2.5 times faster than the 3200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a50f00
810f81
Core
Cezanne
Picasso
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/4
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
4096 kB
Date
February 2021
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
74.56k points
49.21k points
Mean multithread perf.
426.9k points
168.69k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
5800H
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
4.31k
3.89k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
17.51k
17.94k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.53k
5.34k (x0.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
23.57k
6.62k (x0.28)
TOTAL
55.92k
33.79k (x0.6)

Multithread

5800H

3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
24.18k
15.07k (x0.62)
Test#2 (FP)
117.98k
66.84k (x0.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
70.96k
19.56k (x0.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.08k
6.54k (x0.81)
TOTAL
221.19k
108.01k (x0.49)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5800H
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
20.37k
14.48k (x0.71)
Test#2 (FP)
22.52k
23.84k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.18k
5.43k (x0.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.49k
5.46k (x0.25)
TOTAL
74.56k
49.21k (x0.66)

Multithread

5800H

3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
144.01k
54.39k (x0.38)
Test#2 (FP)
191.86k
88.77k (x0.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
84.53k
20.04k (x0.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.5k
5.48k (x0.84)
TOTAL
426.9k
168.69k (x0.4)

Performance/W
5800H
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
3200 points/W
837 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4264 points/W
1366 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1878 points/W
308 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
144 points/W
84 points/W
TOTAL
9487 points/W
2595 points/W

Performance/GHz
5800H
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
4630 points/GHz
3619 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5117 points/GHz
5961 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2314 points/GHz
1357 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4883 points/GHz
1365 points/GHz
TOTAL
16944 points/GHz
12302 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4