Ryzen 7 5800H vs Core i7-11700F
Description
The 5800H is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i7-11700F is based on Rocket Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5800H gets a score of 426.9 k points while the i7-11700F gets 512.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-11700F is 1.2 times faster than the 5800H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5800H gets a score of 426.9 k points while the i7-11700F gets 512.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-11700F is 1.2 times faster than the 5800H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a50f00
a0671
Core
Cezanne
Rocket Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x48 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
16384 kB
Date
February 2021
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
74.56k points
89.58k points
Mean multithread perf.
426.9k points
512.32k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5800H
i7-11700F
Test#1 (Integers)
20.37k
32.55k (x1.6)
Test#2 (FP)
22.52k
26.95k (x1.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.18k
10.76k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.49k
19.32k (x0.9)
TOTAL
74.56k
89.58k (x1.2)
Multithread
5800H
i7-11700F
Test#1 (Integers)
144.01k
232.06k (x1.61)
Test#2 (FP)
191.86k
203.56k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
84.53k
72.89k (x0.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.5k
3.81k (x0.59)
TOTAL
426.9k
512.32k (x1.2)
Performance/W
5800H
i7-11700F
Test#1 (Integers)
3200 points/W
3570 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4264 points/W
3132 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1878 points/W
1121 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
144 points/W
59 points/W
TOTAL
9487 points/W
7882 points/W
Performance/GHz
5800H
i7-11700F
Test#1 (Integers)
4630 points/GHz
6642 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5117 points/GHz
5500 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2314 points/GHz
2196 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4883 points/GHz
3943 points/GHz
TOTAL
16944 points/GHz
18281 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4