| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 5800H vs Core i5-11400


Description
The 5800H is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i5-11400 is based on Rocket Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5800H gets a score of 426.9 k points while the i5-11400 gets 489.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-11400 is 1.1 times faster than the 5800H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a50f00
a0671
Core
Cezanne
Rocket Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x32+6x48 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
12288 kB
Date
February 2021
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
74.56k points
86.11k points
Mean multithread perf.
426.9k points
489.31k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5800H
i5-11400
Test#1 (Integers)
20.37k
31.23k (x1.53)
Test#2 (FP)
22.52k
25.88k (x1.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.18k
10.83k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.49k
18.17k (x0.85)
TOTAL
74.56k
86.11k (x1.15)

Multithread

5800H

i5-11400
Test#1 (Integers)
144.01k
213.85k (x1.49)
Test#2 (FP)
191.86k
195.51k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
84.53k
72.06k (x0.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.5k
7.89k (x1.21)
TOTAL
426.9k
489.31k (x1.15)

Performance/W
5800H
i5-11400
Test#1 (Integers)
3200 points/W
3290 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4264 points/W
3008 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1878 points/W
1109 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
144 points/W
121 points/W
TOTAL
9487 points/W
7528 points/W

Performance/GHz
5800H
i5-11400
Test#1 (Integers)
4630 points/GHz
7098 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5117 points/GHz
5881 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2314 points/GHz
2461 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4883 points/GHz
4130 points/GHz
TOTAL
16944 points/GHz
19570 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4