| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 5700X vs Core i5-1038NG7


Description
The 5700X is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i5-1038NG7 is based on Ice Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5700X gets a score of 517.5 k points while the i5-1038NG7 gets 243.2 k points.

Summarizing, the 5700X is 2.1 times faster than the i5-1038NG7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a20f12
706e5
Core
Vermeer
Ice Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
AM4
FCBGA1344
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
65 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
32768 kB
6144 kB
Date
April 2022
May 2020
Mean monothread perf.
85.64k points
65.35k points
Mean multithread perf.
517.51k points
243.18k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5700X
i5-1038NG7
Test#1 (Integers)
23.24k
23.2k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
25.25k
21.2k (x0.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.66k
9.4k (x0.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
25.49k
11.54k (x0.45)
TOTAL
85.64k
65.35k (x0.76)

Multithread

5700X

i5-1038NG7
Test#1 (Integers)
174.56k
94.68k (x0.54)
Test#2 (FP)
228.94k
103.38k (x0.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
102.32k
35.79k (x0.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.69k
9.33k (x0.8)
TOTAL
517.51k
243.18k (x0.47)

Performance/W
5700X
i5-1038NG7
Test#1 (Integers)
2685 points/W
3381 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3522 points/W
3692 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1574 points/W
1278 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
180 points/W
333 points/W
TOTAL
7962 points/W
8685 points/W

Performance/GHz
5700X
i5-1038NG7
Test#1 (Integers)
5052 points/GHz
6106 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5490 points/GHz
5580 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2535 points/GHz
2473 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5540 points/GHz
3037 points/GHz
TOTAL
18617 points/GHz
17197 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4