| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 5700X vs Core i3-8350K


Description
The 5700X is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i3-8350K is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5700X gets a score of 517.5 k points while the i3-8350K gets 237.6 k points.

Summarizing, the 5700X is 2.2 times faster than the i3-8350K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a20f12
906eb
Core
Vermeer
Coffee Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/4
TDP
65 W
91 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
32768 kB
8192 kB
Date
April 2022
October 2017
Mean monothread perf.
85.64k points
68.36k points
Mean multithread perf.
517.51k points
237.63k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5700X
i3-8350K
Test#1 (Integers)
23.24k
27.29k (x1.17)
Test#2 (FP)
25.25k
24.19k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.66k
5.75k (x0.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
25.49k
11.13k (x0.44)
TOTAL
85.64k
68.36k (x0.8)

Multithread

5700X

i3-8350K
Test#1 (Integers)
174.56k
107.78k (x0.62)
Test#2 (FP)
228.94k
95.93k (x0.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
102.32k
22.65k (x0.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.69k
11.26k (x0.96)
TOTAL
517.51k
237.63k (x0.46)

Performance/W
5700X
i3-8350K
Test#1 (Integers)
2685 points/W
1184 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3522 points/W
1054 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1574 points/W
249 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
180 points/W
124 points/W
TOTAL
7962 points/W
2611 points/W

Performance/GHz
5700X
i3-8350K
Test#1 (Integers)
5052 points/GHz
6823 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5490 points/GHz
6048 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2535 points/GHz
1436 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5540 points/GHz
2784 points/GHz
TOTAL
18617 points/GHz
17091 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4