Ryzen 7 5700X vs Core i9-11900H
Description
The 5700X is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i9-11900H is based on Tiger Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5700X gets a score of 517.5 k points while the i9-11900H gets 584.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-11900H is 1.1 times faster than the 5700X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5700X gets a score of 517.5 k points while the i9-11900H gets 584.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-11900H is 1.1 times faster than the 5700X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a20f12
806d1
Core
Vermeer
Tiger Lake-H
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1787
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
65 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x48 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x1280 kB
Cache L3
32768 kB
24576 kB
Date
April 2022
May 2021
Mean monothread perf.
85.64k points
89.19k points
Mean multithread perf.
517.51k points
584.47k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5700X
i9-11900H
Test#1 (Integers)
23.24k
33.38k (x1.44)
Test#2 (FP)
25.25k
27.12k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.66k
11.69k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
25.49k
17k (x0.67)
TOTAL
85.64k
89.19k (x1.04)
Multithread
5700X
i9-11900H
Test#1 (Integers)
174.56k
249.83k (x1.43)
Test#2 (FP)
228.94k
237.26k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
102.32k
84.18k (x0.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.69k
13.2k (x1.13)
TOTAL
517.51k
584.47k (x1.13)
Performance/W
5700X
i9-11900H
Test#1 (Integers)
2685 points/W
5552 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3522 points/W
5272 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1574 points/W
1871 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
180 points/W
293 points/W
TOTAL
7962 points/W
12988 points/W
Performance/GHz
5700X
i9-11900H
Test#1 (Integers)
5052 points/GHz
6812 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5490 points/GHz
5535 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2535 points/GHz
2386 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5540 points/GHz
3469 points/GHz
TOTAL
18617 points/GHz
18202 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4