| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 5700G vs Core i9-9900K


Description
The 5700G is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i9-9900K is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5700G gets a score of 484.1 k points while the i9-9900K gets 529.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-9900K is 1.1 times faster than the 5700G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a50f00
906ed
Core
Cezanne
Coffee Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.8 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
65 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
16384 kB
Date
April 2021
October 2018
Mean monothread perf.
84.49k points
81.91k points
Mean multithread perf.
484.11k points
529.32k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5700G
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
22.99k
32.08k (x1.4)
Test#2 (FP)
25.24k
28.17k (x1.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.56k
6.68k (x0.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.7k
14.98k (x0.61)
TOTAL
84.49k
81.91k (x0.97)

Multithread

5700G

i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
159.36k
242.98k (x1.52)
Test#2 (FP)
215.57k
220.16k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
98.78k
53.97k (x0.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.4k
12.22k (x1.18)
TOTAL
484.11k
529.32k (x1.09)

Performance/W
5700G
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
2452 points/W
2558 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3316 points/W
2317 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1520 points/W
568 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
160 points/W
129 points/W
TOTAL
7448 points/W
5572 points/W

Performance/GHz
5700G
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
4998 points/GHz
6417 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5487 points/GHz
5634 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2513 points/GHz
1335 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5369 points/GHz
2996 points/GHz
TOTAL
18367 points/GHz
16382 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4