| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 5700G vs Core i7-7700HQ


Description
The 5700G is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i7-7700HQ is based on Kaby Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5700G gets a score of 467.7 k points while the i7-7700HQ gets 208.3 k points.

Summarizing, the 5700G is 2.2 times faster than the i7-7700HQ. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a50f00
906e9
Core
Cezanne
Kaby Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.8 GHz
2.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA1440
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
65 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
6144 kB
Date
April 2021
January 2017
Mean monothread perf.
84.4k points
56.29k points
Mean multithread perf.
467.69k points
208.33k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5700G
i7-7700HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
23.02k
23.27k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
25.22k
20.35k (x0.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.56k
4.76k (x0.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.6k
7.92k (x0.32)
TOTAL
84.4k
56.29k (x0.67)

Multithread

5700G

i7-7700HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
152.53k
93.11k (x0.61)
Test#2 (FP)
208.8k
89.03k (x0.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
95.22k
21.29k (x0.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.15k
4.9k (x0.44)
TOTAL
467.69k
208.33k (x0.45)

Performance/W
5700G
i7-7700HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
2347 points/W
2069 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3212 points/W
1978 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1465 points/W
473 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
172 points/W
109 points/W
TOTAL
7195 points/W
4629 points/W

Performance/GHz
5700G
i7-7700HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
5004 points/GHz
6124 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5483 points/GHz
5354 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2513 points/GHz
1251 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5348 points/GHz
2083 points/GHz
TOTAL
18348 points/GHz
14813 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4