Ryzen 7 5700G vs Core i7-10750H
Description
The 5700G is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i7-10750H is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5700G gets a score of 484.1 k points while the i7-10750H gets 349.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 5700G is 1.4 times faster than the i7-10750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5700G gets a score of 484.1 k points while the i7-10750H gets 349.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 5700G is 1.4 times faster than the i7-10750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a50f00
a0652
Core
Cezanne
Comet Lake-H
Base frecuency
3.8 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
65 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
12288 kB
Date
April 2021
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
84.49k points
75.67k points
Mean multithread perf.
484.11k points
349.21k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5700G
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
22.99k
29.06k (x1.26)
Test#2 (FP)
25.24k
26.49k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.56k
6.23k (x0.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.7k
13.89k (x0.56)
TOTAL
84.49k
75.67k (x0.9)
Multithread
5700G
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
159.36k
154.61k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
215.57k
151.34k (x0.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
98.78k
36.33k (x0.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.4k
6.93k (x0.67)
TOTAL
484.11k
349.21k (x0.72)
Performance/W
5700G
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
2452 points/W
3436 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3316 points/W
3363 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1520 points/W
807 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
160 points/W
154 points/W
TOTAL
7448 points/W
7760 points/W
Performance/GHz
5700G
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
4998 points/GHz
5811 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5487 points/GHz
5298 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2513 points/GHz
1246 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5369 points/GHz
2778 points/GHz
TOTAL
18367 points/GHz
15133 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4