| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 5700G vs Core i7-10610U


Description
The 5700G is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i7-10610U is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5700G gets a score of 484.1 k points while the i7-10610U gets 162 k points.

Summarizing, the 5700G is 3 times faster than the i7-10610U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a50f00
806ec
Core
Cezanne
Comet Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.8 GHz
1.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
AM4
FCBGA 1528
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
65 W
25 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
8192 kB
Date
April 2021
May 2020
Mean monothread perf.
84.49k points
56.65k points
Mean multithread perf.
484.11k points
162k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5700G
i7-10610U
Test#1 (Integers)
22.99k
23.1k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
25.24k
20k (x0.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.56k
4.61k (x0.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.7k
8.94k (x0.36)
TOTAL
84.49k
56.65k (x0.67)

Multithread

5700G

i7-10610U
Test#1 (Integers)
159.36k
73.36k (x0.46)
Test#2 (FP)
215.57k
68.28k (x0.32)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
98.78k
13.73k (x0.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.4k
6.62k (x0.64)
TOTAL
484.11k
162k (x0.33)

Performance/W
5700G
i7-10610U
Test#1 (Integers)
2452 points/W
2934 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3316 points/W
2731 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1520 points/W
549 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
160 points/W
265 points/W
TOTAL
7448 points/W
6480 points/W

Performance/GHz
5700G
i7-10610U
Test#1 (Integers)
4998 points/GHz
4715 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5487 points/GHz
4082 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2513 points/GHz
940 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5369 points/GHz
1825 points/GHz
TOTAL
18367 points/GHz
11562 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4