Ryzen 7 5700G vs Core i5-9400F
Description
The 5700G is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i5-9400F is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5700G gets a score of 467.7 k points while the i5-9400F gets 331.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 5700G is 1.4 times faster than the i5-9400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5700G gets a score of 467.7 k points while the i5-9400F gets 331.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 5700G is 1.4 times faster than the i5-9400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a50f00
906ea
Core
Cezanne
Coffee Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.8 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/6
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
9216 kB
Date
April 2021
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
84.4k points
67.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
467.69k points
331.19k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5700G
i5-9400F
Test#1 (Integers)
23.02k
27.15k (x1.18)
Test#2 (FP)
25.22k
23.63k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.56k
5.38k (x0.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.6k
11.61k (x0.47)
TOTAL
84.4k
67.77k (x0.8)
Multithread
5700G
i5-9400F
Test#1 (Integers)
152.53k
156.61k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
208.8k
138k (x0.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
95.22k
29.45k (x0.31)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.15k
7.14k (x0.64)
TOTAL
467.69k
331.19k (x0.71)
Performance/W
5700G
i5-9400F
Test#1 (Integers)
2347 points/W
2409 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3212 points/W
2123 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1465 points/W
453 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
172 points/W
110 points/W
TOTAL
7195 points/W
5095 points/W
Performance/GHz
5700G
i5-9400F
Test#1 (Integers)
5004 points/GHz
6622 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5483 points/GHz
5763 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2513 points/GHz
1312 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5348 points/GHz
2831 points/GHz
TOTAL
18348 points/GHz
16528 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4