| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 5700G vs Ryzen 9 5900HS


Description
Both models 5700G and 5900HS are based on Zen 3 architecture.

Zen 3 uses TSMC’s 7nm process, still uses the AM4 socket and has up yo 32MB of L3 cache per CCX.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5700G gets a score of 467.7 k points while the 5900HS gets 435 k points.

Summarizing, the 5700G is 1.1 times faster than the 5900HS. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a50f00
a50f00
Core
Cezanne
Cezanne
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.8 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA-FP6
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
65 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
16384 kB
Date
April 2021
December 2021
Mean monothread perf.
84.4k points
81.87k points
Mean multithread perf.
467.69k points
434.96k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5700G
5900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
23.02k
21.2k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
25.22k
25k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.56k
11.44k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.6k
24.22k (x0.98)
TOTAL
84.4k
81.87k (x0.97)

Multithread

5700G

5900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
152.53k
145.13k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
208.8k
198.36k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
95.22k
85.67k (x0.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.15k
5.79k (x0.52)
TOTAL
467.69k
434.96k (x0.93)

Performance/W
5700G
5900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
2347 points/W
4147 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3212 points/W
5667 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1465 points/W
2448 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
172 points/W
166 points/W
TOTAL
7195 points/W
12427 points/W

Performance/GHz
5700G
5900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
5004 points/GHz
4608 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5483 points/GHz
5436 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2513 points/GHz
2488 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5348 points/GHz
5266 points/GHz
TOTAL
18348 points/GHz
17797 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4