Ryzen 7 5700G vs Ryzen 9 3900
Description
The 5700G is based on Zen 3 architecture while the 3900 is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5700G gets a score of 467.7 k points while the 3900 gets 687.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 3900 is 1.5 times faster than the 5700G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5700G gets a score of 467.7 k points while the 3900 gets 687.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 3900 is 1.5 times faster than the 5700G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a50f00
870f10
Core
Cezanne
Matisse
Base frecuency
3.8 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
AM4
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
12/24
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
12x512 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
4x16384 kB
Date
April 2021
September 2019
Mean monothread perf.
84.4k points
74.97k points
Mean multithread perf.
467.69k points
687.5k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5700G
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
23.02k
16.85k (x0.73)
Test#2 (FP)
25.22k
26.03k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.56k
9.54k (x0.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.6k
22.55k (x0.92)
TOTAL
84.4k
74.97k (x0.89)
Multithread
5700G
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
152.53k
229.41k (x1.5)
Test#2 (FP)
208.8k
292.81k (x1.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
95.22k
128.48k (x1.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.15k
36.8k (x3.3)
TOTAL
467.69k
687.5k (x1.47)
Performance/W
5700G
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
2347 points/W
3529 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3212 points/W
4505 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1465 points/W
1977 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
172 points/W
566 points/W
TOTAL
7195 points/W
10577 points/W
Performance/GHz
5700G
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
5004 points/GHz
3920 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5483 points/GHz
6054 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2513 points/GHz
2218 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5348 points/GHz
5243 points/GHz
TOTAL
18348 points/GHz
17435 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4