| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 5700G vs Core i3-12100F


Description
The 5700G is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i3-12100F is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5700G gets a score of 484.1 k points while the i3-12100F gets 340.5 k points.

Summarizing, the 5700G is 1.4 times faster than the i3-12100F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a50f00
90675
Core
Cezanne
Alder Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.8 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
65 W
58 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+x4x48 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
12288 kB
Date
April 2021
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
84.49k points
88.81k points
Mean multithread perf.
484.11k points
340.49k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5700G
i3-12100F
Test#1 (Integers)
22.99k
39.54k (x1.72)
Test#2 (FP)
25.24k
23.79k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.56k
11.96k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.7k
13.52k (x0.55)
TOTAL
84.49k
88.81k (x1.05)

Multithread

5700G

i3-12100F
Test#1 (Integers)
159.36k
148k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
215.57k
123.08k (x0.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
98.78k
52.73k (x0.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.4k
16.67k (x1.6)
TOTAL
484.11k
340.49k (x0.7)

Performance/W
5700G
i3-12100F
Test#1 (Integers)
2452 points/W
2552 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3316 points/W
2122 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1520 points/W
909 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
160 points/W
287 points/W
TOTAL
7448 points/W
5871 points/W

Performance/GHz
5700G
i3-12100F
Test#1 (Integers)
4998 points/GHz
9195 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5487 points/GHz
5532 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2513 points/GHz
2781 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5369 points/GHz
3144 points/GHz
TOTAL
18367 points/GHz
20652 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4