Ryzen 7 4800U vs Core i7-8750H
Description
The 4800U is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i7-8750H is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4800U gets a score of 356.8 k points while the i7-8750H gets 231.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 4800U is 1.5 times faster than the i7-8750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4800U gets a score of 356.8 k points while the i7-8750H gets 231.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 4800U is 1.5 times faster than the i7-8750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
860f01
906ea
Core
Renoir
Coffee Lake-H
Base frecuency
1.8 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
BGA1440
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
15 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
9216 kB
Date
January 2020
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
57.92k points
53.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
356.81k points
231.9k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4800U
i7-8750H
Test#1 (Integers)
16.53k
22.36k (x1.35)
Test#2 (FP)
24.67k
19.33k (x0.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.04k
4.4k (x0.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.68k
7.32k (x0.95)
TOTAL
57.92k
53.41k (x0.92)
Multithread
4800U
i7-8750H
Test#1 (Integers)
121.96k
103.82k (x0.85)
Test#2 (FP)
162.82k
100.47k (x0.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
68.25k
23.81k (x0.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.79k
3.8k (x1)
TOTAL
356.81k
231.9k (x0.65)
Performance/W
4800U
i7-8750H
Test#1 (Integers)
8131 points/W
2307 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
10854 points/W
2233 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4550 points/W
529 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
252 points/W
84 points/W
TOTAL
23788 points/W
5153 points/W
Performance/GHz
4800U
i7-8750H
Test#1 (Integers)
3936 points/GHz
5454 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5873 points/GHz
4714 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2153 points/GHz
1073 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1828 points/GHz
1786 points/GHz
TOTAL
13790 points/GHz
13027 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4