| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 4800U vs Core i7-6560U


Description
The 4800U is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i7-6560U is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4800U gets a score of 356.8 k points while the i7-6560U gets 107 k points.

Summarizing, the 4800U is 3.3 times faster than the i7-6560U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
860f01
406e3
Core
Renoir
Skylake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.8 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
3.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
8/16
2/4
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2020
September 2015
Mean monothread perf.
57.92k points
52.96k points
Mean multithread perf.
356.81k points
107.01k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4800U
i7-6560U
Test#1 (Integers)
16.53k
22.21k (x1.34)
Test#2 (FP)
24.67k
19.25k (x0.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.04k
4.41k (x0.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.68k
7.09k (x0.92)
TOTAL
57.92k
52.96k (x0.91)

Multithread

4800U

i7-6560U
Test#1 (Integers)
121.96k
44.94k (x0.37)
Test#2 (FP)
162.82k
44.98k (x0.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
68.25k
10.83k (x0.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.79k
6.26k (x1.65)
TOTAL
356.81k
107.01k (x0.3)

Performance/W
4800U
i7-6560U
Test#1 (Integers)
8131 points/W
2996 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
10854 points/W
2998 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4550 points/W
722 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
252 points/W
418 points/W
TOTAL
23788 points/W
7134 points/W

Performance/GHz
4800U
i7-6560U
Test#1 (Integers)
3936 points/GHz
6941 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5873 points/GHz
6017 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2153 points/GHz
1377 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1828 points/GHz
2214 points/GHz
TOTAL
13790 points/GHz
16550 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4