| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 4800U vs Core i5-8500T


Description
The 4800U is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i5-8500T is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4800U gets a score of 356.8 k points while the i5-8500T gets 251.8 k points.

Summarizing, the 4800U is 1.4 times faster than the i5-8500T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
860f01
906ea
Core
Renoir
Coffee Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.8 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/6
TDP
15 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
9216 kB
Date
January 2020
March 2018
Mean monothread perf.
57.92k points
59.27k points
Mean multithread perf.
356.81k points
251.82k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4800U
i5-8500T
Test#1 (Integers)
16.53k
23.13k (x1.4)
Test#2 (FP)
24.67k
20.7k (x0.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.04k
4.71k (x0.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.68k
10.73k (x1.4)
TOTAL
57.92k
59.27k (x1.02)

Multithread

4800U

i5-8500T
Test#1 (Integers)
121.96k
125.17k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
162.82k
98.07k (x0.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
68.25k
25.57k (x0.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.79k
3.01k (x0.8)
TOTAL
356.81k
251.82k (x0.71)

Performance/W
4800U
i5-8500T
Test#1 (Integers)
8131 points/W
3576 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
10854 points/W
2802 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4550 points/W
731 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
252 points/W
86 points/W
TOTAL
23788 points/W
7195 points/W

Performance/GHz
4800U
i5-8500T
Test#1 (Integers)
3936 points/GHz
6608 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5873 points/GHz
5914 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2153 points/GHz
1346 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1828 points/GHz
3067 points/GHz
TOTAL
13790 points/GHz
16934 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4