| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 4800U vs Core i3-6100T


Description
The 4800U is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i3-6100T is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4800U gets a score of 356.8 k points while the i3-6100T gets 105.2 k points.

Summarizing, the 4800U is 3.4 times faster than the i3-6100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
860f01
506e3
Core
Renoir
Skylake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.8 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
3.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
8/16
2/4
TDP
15 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
3072 kB
Date
January 2020
November 2015
Mean monothread perf.
57.92k points
43.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
356.81k points
105.21k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4800U
i3-6100T
Test#1 (Integers)
16.53k
19.58k (x1.18)
Test#2 (FP)
24.67k
16.97k (x0.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.04k
3.91k (x0.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.68k
3.47k (x0.45)
TOTAL
57.92k
43.92k (x0.76)

Multithread

4800U

i3-6100T
Test#1 (Integers)
121.96k
47.02k (x0.39)
Test#2 (FP)
162.82k
44.41k (x0.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
68.25k
9.93k (x0.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.79k
3.85k (x1.02)
TOTAL
356.81k
105.21k (x0.29)

Performance/W
4800U
i3-6100T
Test#1 (Integers)
8131 points/W
1344 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
10854 points/W
1269 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4550 points/W
284 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
252 points/W
110 points/W
TOTAL
23788 points/W
3006 points/W

Performance/GHz
4800U
i3-6100T
Test#1 (Integers)
3936 points/GHz
6119 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5873 points/GHz
5303 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2153 points/GHz
1221 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1828 points/GHz
1084 points/GHz
TOTAL
13790 points/GHz
13726 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4