| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 4800U vs Core i3-10100T


Description
The 4800U is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i3-10100T is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4800U gets a score of 356.8 k points while the i3-10100T gets 227.7 k points.

Summarizing, the 4800U is 1.6 times faster than the i3-10100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
860f01
a0653
Core
Renoir
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.8 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
FC-LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2020
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
57.92k points
60.06k points
Mean multithread perf.
356.81k points
227.67k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4800U
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
16.53k
24.31k (x1.47)
Test#2 (FP)
24.67k
22.15k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.04k
5.14k (x0.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.68k
8.46k (x1.1)
TOTAL
57.92k
60.06k (x1.04)

Multithread

4800U

i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
121.96k
101.48k (x0.83)
Test#2 (FP)
162.82k
98.04k (x0.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
68.25k
24.28k (x0.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.79k
3.86k (x1.02)
TOTAL
356.81k
227.67k (x0.64)

Performance/W
4800U
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
8131 points/W
1561 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
10854 points/W
1508 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4550 points/W
374 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
252 points/W
59 points/W
TOTAL
23788 points/W
3503 points/W

Performance/GHz
4800U
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
3936 points/GHz
5653 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5873 points/GHz
5150 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2153 points/GHz
1196 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1828 points/GHz
1967 points/GHz
TOTAL
13790 points/GHz
13967 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4