| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 4800U vs Ryzen 5 3500U


Description
The 4800U is based on Zen 2 architecture while the 3500U is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4800U gets a score of 356.8 k points while the 3500U gets 141 k points.

Summarizing, the 4800U is 2.5 times faster than the 3500U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
860f01
810f81
Core
Renoir
Picasso
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.8 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2020
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
57.92k points
36.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
356.81k points
140.97k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4800U
3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
16.53k
10.88k (x0.66)
Test#2 (FP)
24.67k
18.09k (x0.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.04k
4.29k (x0.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.68k
3.36k (x0.44)
TOTAL
57.92k
36.64k (x0.63)

Multithread

4800U

3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
121.96k
42.44k (x0.35)
Test#2 (FP)
162.82k
73.82k (x0.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
68.25k
20.76k (x0.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.79k
3.96k (x1.05)
TOTAL
356.81k
140.97k (x0.4)

Performance/W
4800U
3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
8131 points/W
2829 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
10854 points/W
4921 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4550 points/W
1384 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
252 points/W
264 points/W
TOTAL
23788 points/W
9398 points/W

Performance/GHz
4800U
3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
3936 points/GHz
2942 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5873 points/GHz
4890 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2153 points/GHz
1161 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1828 points/GHz
909 points/GHz
TOTAL
13790 points/GHz
9901 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4